临床肿瘤学杂志

• 临床应用 • 上一篇    下一篇

脑转移瘤调强同步推量照射与适形序贯推量照射的剂量学研究

丁巍,王晓萍,刘丽,刘海,张新良   

  1. 解放军八一医院全军肿瘤中心放疗科
  • 收稿日期:2012-05-23 修回日期:2012-05-29 出版日期:2012-09-29 发布日期:2012-09-29
  • 通讯作者: 王晓萍

Dosimetric study of SB-CRT and SIBIMRT in metastatic tumor of brain

  • Received:2012-05-23 Revised:2012-05-29 Online:2012-09-29 Published:2012-09-29

摘要: 目的 比较采取调强同步推量照射(SIB-IMRT)与适形序贯推量照射(SB-CRT)治疗脑转移瘤剂量分布的差异。方法 11例多发脑转移瘤患者经CT模拟机定位后分别勾画转移肿瘤、全脑等靶区,再应用Varian Eclips计划系统对每例患者分别制定SIB与CRT放疗计划。SIB计划给予全脑计划靶区(PTV)40Gy/20f,转移瘤计划肿瘤靶区(PGTV)60Gy/20f。CRT计划给予全脑PTV40Gy/20f,后缩野至转移病灶PGTV20Gy/10f。配对比较两种计划全脑、脑干、视神经、晶状体受量的最大值及平均值,以及两种计划靶区的适形度和不均匀性指数。 结果 SIB计划中左、右视神经以及脑干和全脑的平均剂量分别为35.2±5.2、38.9±5.5、41.9±3.7和44.6±4.2Gy; CRT计划平均剂量分别为40.7±8.9、42.6±6.4、47.8±7.6和49.2±5.3Gy,两者差异有统计学意义。SIB计划中上述各部位的最高剂量(Gy)分别为42.3±3.5、43.6±3.2、46.6±4.1和55.5±4.7;CRT计划中最高剂量(Gy)分别为45.6±3.5、47.3±4.7、50.4±3.6和64.3±6.6,两者差异有统计学意义。SIB计划中靶区的适形度为0.88±0.07,明显优于CRT计划的0.72±0.11。SIB计划靶区的不均匀性指数为1.06±0.02,低于CRT计划的1.09±0.03,差异有统计学意义。
结论在全脑及脑部转移瘤受到相同物理剂量的条件下,采用SIB-IMRT较SB-CRT可以更好地降低脑部正常组织的受量,明显提高靶区剂量分布的适形度和均匀性。

Abstract: Objective To compare the dose distribution of SIBIMRT and SBCRT in the radiotherapy of brain metastasis. Methods Eleven patients with multiple brain metastasis tumors were sketched the target areas of metastasis and whole brain through CT simulative localization. Plans of SIB and CRT were made by Varian Eclips system. The whole brain PTV was 40Gy/20f, and the metastasis PGTV was 60Gy/20f in SIB plan. In CRT plan the whole brain PTV was 40Gy/20f, then the metastasis PGTV was an extra boost of 20Gy/10f. The maximum and mean dose of the whole brain, brain stem, optic nerves and lens were compared using a matched pair study. Also we compared the comformity index(CI) and heterogeneity index(HI) of the PGTV.
ResultsThe mean dose of the left and right optic nerves, the whole brain and the brain stem were 35.2±5.2,38.9±5.5,41.9±3.7 and 44.6±4.2Gy in SIB plan, and were 40.7±8.9,42.6±6.4,47.8±7.6 and 49.2±5.3Gy in CRT plan. The maximum dose of these organs were 42.3±3.5,43.6±3.2,46.6±4.1and 55.5±4.7Gy in SIB plan, and were 45.6±3.5,47.3±4.7,50.4±3.6 and 64.3±6.6Gy in CRT plan. The mean and the maximum dose in the SIB plan were less than those in the CRT plan with siginificant differents. The dose of the lens seemed to be no difference in the two plans. The CI of PGTV in the SIB plan was 0.88±0.07, which was significantly superior to 072±011 in the CRT plan. The HI of PGTV in the SIB plan was 1.06±0.02, which is significantly lower than 1.09±0.03 in the CRT plan. The difference of CI and HI was statistically significant. Conclusion On the condition that the wholebrain and the brain metastasis tumor receive the same amount of physical dose, rather than SB-CRT, the SIB-IMRT may more efficiently reduce the dose acting on normal tissues of brain, improve the CI and HI of PTV,and theologically improve the therapeutic effect, reduce the acute and tardus damage caused by radiotherapy.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!