临床肿瘤学杂志

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

甲磺酸伊马替尼一线治疗复发/转移胃肠间质瘤患者的临床分析

刘秀峰,秦叔逵,王琳,陈映霞,华海清,龚新雷,曹梦苒,方蓉   

  1. 210002 南京 解放军八一医院全军肿瘤中心内科
  • 收稿日期:2012-08-17 修回日期:2012-10-13 出版日期:2013-01-31 发布日期:2013-01-31
  • 通讯作者: 秦叔逵

Clinical analysis of imatinib mesylate as the first-line treatment for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors

LIU Xiufeng, QIN Shukui, WANG Lin, CHEN Yingxia, HUA Haiqing, GONG Xinlei, CAO Mengran, FANG Rong   

  1. Department of Medical Oncology, PLA Cancer Center, 81 Hospital of PLA, Nanjing 210002, China
  • Received:2012-08-17 Revised:2012-10-13 Online:2013-01-31 Published:2013-01-31
  • Contact: QIN Shukui

摘要: 目的 回顾性分析国人复发/转移的胃肠间质瘤(GISTs)患者一线应用甲磺酸伊马替尼的有效性、安全性以及预后的影响因素。方法 对2003年4月至2012年3月接受伊马替尼400mg/d一线治疗的患者进行随访,按RECIST 1.0版进行疗效评价,根据NCI CTC 3.0版标准进行毒副反应评价。应用SPSS 13.0统计学软件进行数据处理,分层分析影响国人肿瘤进展时间(TTP)和总生存时间(OS)的相关因素。结果 接受一线治疗的复发/转移GISTs 患者共105例,中位随访时间126个月(范围:44~348个月),至随访截止日期死亡36例。获CR 8例(7.6%),PR 62例(59.0%),SD 14例(13.3%),PD 21例(20.0%);有效率为66.6%,疾病控制率为79.9%。全组患者的中位TTP为61.5个月,中位OS为600个月(95%CI:52.1~67.8个月)。接受辅助治疗与未接受辅助治疗、接受二线治疗与未接受二线治疗的患者比较,中位TTP和OS差异均无统计学意义;停药3~12个月组与停药3个月内组、未停药组的中位TTP差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),而停药3个月内组与未停药组的差异无统计学意义;停药3~12个月组与停药3个月内组、未停药组的中位OS差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),而停药3个月内组与未停药组的差异无统计学意义。主要毒副反应为乏力、皮肤黏膜水肿、白细胞减少、腹泻等,多为1~2级,未发生治疗相关性死亡。结论 对于复发/转移的GISTs患者,一线应用伊马替尼400mg/d治疗安全有效。结合中国患者的依从性和经济等因素,是否接受辅助治疗以及是否接受二线治疗对TTP和OS的影响可能不大,而中断治疗超过3个月可能会导致疾病进展,并最终转化为OS的劣势。

Abstract: ObjectiveTo retrospectively analyze the efficacy,safety and progrostic factors affecting responses of imatinib mesylate as the first-line therapy for Chinese patients with recurrent or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors(GISTs). Methods Patients treated with imatinib mesylate 400mg daily as the first-line treatment from Apr. 2003 to Mar. 2012 were followed up. Short-term efficacy was evaluated according to RECIST version 1.0 criteria and toxicity according to NCI CTC version 3.0 criteria. Relative factors affecting time to progress(TTP)and overall survival(OS)were stratified analyzed using SPSS 13.0 software. Results Totally there were 105 cases enrolled in this retrospective analysis,with median followingup duration of 126 months(range:44-348months),meanwhile 36 patients died during the period. The response rate was 66.6% and disease control rate was 79.9%,including 8(7.6%)cases of CR,62(59.0%)of PR, 14(13.3%)of SD and 21 cases(20.0%)of PD. Median TTP and OS of all cases were 61.5months and 60.0 months(95%CI:52.1-67.8 months),respectively. After being stratified,cases were enlisted into three comparative groups:adjuvant or not groups,second-line or not groups and treatment discontinued or not groups. TTP and OS of patients in adjuvant or second-line groups had no significant differences compared with “not” groups. Contrarily,TTP and OS of patients with treatment discontinued for 3-12months was significantly decreased compared with discontinued less than 3 months(P<0.05)or continued group(P<0.05),while no difference observed between latter two groups. Common toxicities were fatigue, skin mucosal edema, leukopenia, diarrhea, etc. mainly in grade 1-2,with no treatment-related death. Conclusion Imatinib mesylate 400mg daily as the first-line therapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic GISTs was safety and effective. Considering the compliances and economy of Chinese GISTs'patients,receiving adjuvant or second-line therapies or not probably have minor influences on TTP and OS. Impressively,treatment discontinued longer than 3 months maybe induce disease progression and translate into disadvantage of OS finally.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!