临床肿瘤学杂志

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

荧光原位杂交和免疫组织化学法检测乳腺浸润性导管癌中HER-2基因状态的研究

戴菡珏1,陈昊1,朱卫东2,徐晶晶1,郭凌川2,国风1
  

  1. 1 苏州大学附属第一医院临床检测中心2 苏州大学附属第一医院病理科
  • 收稿日期:2017-02-21 修回日期:2017-04-08 出版日期:2017-07-31 发布日期:2017-07-31
  • 通讯作者: 国风

Comparison of fluorescence in situ hybridization with immunohistochemistry in detecting HER-2 status in infiltrating ductal breast carcinoma

  1. Center for Clinical Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University
  • Received:2017-02-21 Revised:2017-04-08 Online:2017-07-31 Published:2017-07-31
  • Contact: GUO Feng

摘要:

目的 比较荧光原位杂交(FISH)和免疫组织化学(IHC)两种方法检测乳腺浸润性导管癌人类表皮生长因子受体2(HER-2)基因扩增及与C-erbB-2蛋白表达结果的一致性。
方法 分别采用FISH和IHC法检测346例乳腺浸润性导管癌组织HER-2基因扩增和C-erbB-2蛋白表达,并对两种方法的结果进行统计学分析。结果 346例乳腺浸润性导管癌中,FISH检测HER-2基因扩增145例(41.9%),无扩增201例(58.1%)。IHC检测显示,C-erbB-2蛋白(-)7例,(+)30例,(++)227例,(+++)82例。按乳腺癌HER-2检测指南,(-)和(+)为阴性结果,(+++)为阳性结果,(++)为不确定病例。全组IHC检测C-erbB-2蛋白阳性表达率为23.7%(82/346)。IHC检测C-erbB-2蛋白(-)的7例患者经FISH检测无HER-2基因扩增,一致率为100.0%。IHC检测C-erbB-2蛋白(+)的30例经FISH检测25例无基因扩增,一致率为83.3%;227例(++)中有65例基因扩增,一致率为28.6%;82例(+++)中有基因扩增75例,一致率为91.5%。IHC和FISH检测HER-2状态的一致率为89.9%,具有高度一致性(Kappa值=0.768,P<0.001)。HER-2基因扩增与年龄、肿瘤大小、组织学分级及淋巴结转移均无关(P>0.05)。
结论IHC和FISH法检测乳腺浸润性导管癌HER-2表达状态有高度一致性。IHC可以作为初步筛查乳腺浸润性导管癌HER-2基因状态的首选检测方法,对于IHC检测结果为(++)的标本建议采用FISH法进一步明确HER-2基因扩增状态。

Abstract: Objective To compare the consistence of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with immunohistochemistry (IHC) in detecting human epidermalgrowth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) status in infiltrating ductal breast carcinoma. Methods The expression of C-erbB-2 protein and HER2 gene amplification of 346 cases with infiltrating ductal breast carcinoma was tested by IHC and FISH methods, and the results were compared.
ResultsAmong 346 specimens of infiltrating ductal breast carcinoma, HER-2 gene amplification was present in 145 cases (41.9%) by FISH, and absent in 201 cases (58.1%). IHC detection of C-erbB-2 protein results showed that (-) in 7 cases, (+) in 30 cases, (++) in 227 cases and (+++) in 82 cases. According to the guidline for the detection of HER2 in breast cancer, (-) and (+) were negative results, (+++) was positive results, and (++) was uncertain. The positive rate of C-erbB-2 protein in 346 specimens was 23.7% (82/346). There were 7 cases with negative expression of C-erbB-2 by IHC, among which HER-2 gene amplification was absent in 7 cases with the coincidence rate of 100.0%. Five among 30 showed a negative result of (+) by IHC, but was positive in FISH, and the coincidence rate was 833%. In the 227 cases with a positive result of (++) by IHC, the amplification of HER2 gene was present in 65 cases, with the coincidence rate of 28.6%.The positive result of (+++) was demonstrate in 82 cases, among whom the HER-2 gene amplification was detected in 75 cases, with the coincidence rate of 915%. The consistency of these two methods was very good in the cases with negative (-/+) or positive (+++) expression of CerbB2. The total concordance rate of HER2 between IHC and FISH trials was 899% with the Kappa value of 0.768(P<0.001). HER-2 gene amplification was not related to age, tumor size, histological grade and lymph node metastasis (P>0.05). Conclusion HER-2 expression of infiltrating ductal breast carcinoma detected by IHC was highly consistent with FISH detection. IHC is a preliminary method to detect HER-2 status in infiltrating ductal breast carcinoma. However, in the cases with positive (++) expression of C-erbB-2, FISH should be performed to detect the gene amplification of HER-2.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!