Chinese Clinical Oncology

• 论著 • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Efficacy observation of ginsenoside Rg3 combined with FOLFOX 4 regimen for patients with carcinoma of rectum

CHEN Dafu, ZHUANG Yongjing, HUANG Jianqiang   

  1. Department of General Surgery, the 421th Hospital of PLA,Guangzhou 510318,China
  • Received:2012-09-07 Revised:2012-12-03 Online:2013-02-28 Published:2013-02-28

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ginsenoside Rg3 combined with FOLFOX 4 regimen on patients with carcinoma of rectum. Methods Fifty-two patients after radical resection of rectal carcinoma were randomly divided into two groups. FOLFOX 4 chemotherapy regimen (L-OHP 85mg/m2 iv,d1; CF 200mg/m2 iv,d1-d2; 5-FU 400mg/m2 iv bolus firstly, then 5-FU 600mg/m2 iv,d1-d2, and two weeks was a cycle) was used in simple chemotherapy group and Rg3combined chemotherapy group underwent Rg3(Rg3 40mg/d po,bid)for 2 months combined with FOLFOX 4. The changes of serum VEGF levels were detected by ELISA method. The quality of life, longterm efficacy and toxicity were evaluated. Results After twomonth treatment,KPS score of Rg3combined chemotherapy group was 75.0±8.3,which was significantly higher than that of simple chemotherapy group (P<0.05). Compared with simple chemotherapy group, toxic reactions such as sensory neurotoxicity, naupathia and vomiting were decreased in Rg3-combined chemotherapy group (P<0.05). Moreover, serum VEGFs posttreatment of Rg3combined chemotherapy group was 123.26±54.83ng/ml,which was significantly lower than that of simple chemotherapy group (256.71±78.11ng/ml,P<0.05). Five-year survival rate of Rg3combined chemotherapy group was 61.4%, which was significantly higher than that of simple chemotherapy group (47.6%,P<0.05). Conclusion Rg3 combined with FOLFOX 4 regimen is effective for patients with carcinoma of rectum,is superior to simple FOLFOX 4 chemotherapy, and it can improve quality of life. It may have practical clinical value and worth to study further.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!