Please wait a minute...
涂料工业  2018, Vol. 48 Issue (3): 57-63    https://doi.org/10.12020/j.issn.0253-4312.2018.3.57
  应用研究 |
某油田油水混输管道用缓蚀剂的筛选与评价
徐振臻1,刘小伟1,胡徐彦1,兰旭2
1. 中海石油(中国)有限公司湛江分公司,广东湛江 524000; 2. 安科工程技术研究院(北京)有限公司,北京 100083
Inhibitor Screening and Evaluation for Oil and Water mixed Pipelines in oilfield
Xu Zhenzhen 1,Liu Xiaowei 1,Hu Xuyan 1,Lan Xu 2
1. Zhanjiang Branch of CNOOC Ltd., Zhanjiang, Guangdong 524000, China; 2. Safetech Research Institute, Beijing 100029, China
下载:  PDF (2637KB) 
输出:  BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      
摘要 设计了一套系统的油水混输管道用缓蚀剂的筛选与评价方法。以涠洲某油水混输海管为案例,利用该缓蚀剂筛选评价方法,针对该管道生产工艺特点,进行了系统的缓蚀剂筛选评价。根据该筛选方案,首先进行现场工况数据的收集与分析,再对8种缓蚀剂进行了初步筛选,包括理化性能测试(溶解性、乳化倾向、发泡性和与其他药剂配伍性等)与电化学测试。在上述筛选基础上,选取最苛刻的腐蚀工况点,并考虑缓蚀剂加注浓度的变化,在50 mg/L与40 mg/L的加注浓度下进行动态模拟试验评价缓蚀剂的缓蚀性能。最后结合缓蚀效果及经济性两方面,筛选出了满足要求的缓蚀剂及对应的加注浓度。结果表明该缓蚀剂筛选评价方案在实际工程应用上切实可行。
服务
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章
闫婷婷
关键词:  油水混输  缓蚀剂筛选  理化性能  电化学  动态模拟    
Abstract: Based on a lot of literature investigation and practical engineering experience, a systematic screening and evaluation method of inhibitors for oil-water mixed pipeline has been established. With the case of Weizhou oil-water mixed pipeline, this paper systematically illustrates the corrosion screening and evaluation method aimed at the characteristics of production of the pipeline. According to the scheme, the collection and analysis of field condition data have been carried out first, and then the physical and chemical properties (solubility, emulsibility, foaming and compatibility) and electrochemical properties of the 8 optional inhibitors have been tested for preliminary screening. On the base of the above screening and the analysis of field condition, the areas under the most critical corrosion conditions are provided, wherein the influential factor such as corrosion inhibitor concentration is analyzed. For instance, the dynamic simulation tests of 50 mg/L and 40 mg/L concentration were conducted to evaluate the corrosion inhibition performance of inhibitors. Finally combining with the corrosion inhibition effect and economic considerations, corrosion inhibitor and the corresponding concentration were selected. The results show that this scheme can be used for the corrosion inhibitor screening.
Key words:  oil-water mixed    inhibitor evaluation    physical and chemical properties    electrochemistry    dynamic simulation
收稿日期:  2017-09-29      修回日期:  2018-01-11           出版日期:  2018-03-01      发布日期:  2018-05-23      期的出版日期:  2018-03-01
通讯作者:  闫婷婷    E-mail:  303909301@qq.com
引用本文:    
徐振臻, 刘小伟, 胡徐彦, 兰旭. 某油田油水混输管道用缓蚀剂的筛选与评价[J]. 涂料工业, 2018, 48(3): 57-63.
Xu Zhenzhen , Liu Xiaowei , Hu Xuyan , Lan Xu . Inhibitor Screening and Evaluation for Oil and Water mixed Pipelines in oilfield. Paint & Coatings Industry, 2018, 48(3): 57-63.
链接本文:  
http://manu65.magtech.com.cn/Jwk3_tlgy/CN/10.12020/j.issn.0253-4312.2018.3.57  或          http://manu65.magtech.com.cn/Jwk3_tlgy/CN/Y2018/V48/I3/57
[1] 胡永碧, 谷坛, 王坚,等.高酸性气田集输系统用缓蚀剂筛选评价试验[J].石油与天然气化工, 2007, 36(5):401-403
[2] 李芳, 许艳艳, 冯一波,等.抗氧缓蚀剂筛选评价研究[J].中国化工贸易, 2015, 7(31):215-
[3] 徐海升, 李谦定, 薛岗林,等.油气田缓蚀剂的筛选与评价[J].石油化工腐蚀与防护, 2009, 26(2):4-6
[4] 秦开明, 彭建国, 李芳,等.N80钢CO2腐蚀缓蚀剂筛选及性能评价[J].管道技术与设备, 2013, (6):30-32
[5] 张金钟, 郑丹莉.全国缓蚀剂学术讨论会[C]. 上海:上海材料研究所,2012: 258-260.
[6] 采油采气专业标准化委员会. SY/T.[J].-2014油田采出水处理用缓蚀剂性能指标及评价方法[S].北京:国家能源局,, 5273, :2014.-
[7] ASTM Committee G01.G170-06 Standard guide for evaluating and qualifying oilfield and refinery corrosion inhibitors in the laboratory[S]. West Conshohocken: ASTM International, 2006
[8] 陈迪.油田用缓蚀剂筛选与评价程序研究[J].全面腐蚀控制, 2009, 23(3):8-10
[9] 李自力, 尚兴彬, 郝宏娜,等.油气集输管道缓蚀剂筛选试验方法[J].腐蚀与防护, 2012, (3):177-180
[10] 唐永帆, 闫康平, 李辉,等.油气井防腐用缓蚀剂的评选程序研究[J].石油与天然气化工, 2004, 33(6):427-429
[11] ISO/TC67. NACE MR0175/ISO.[J].6 Petroleum and natural gas industries-materials for use in H2S-containing environment in oil and gas production[S]. EURO/AMERICA:, 1515, ANSI/NACE/ISO,:2009-
No related articles found!
[1] Zhang Guoliang, Ma Chunfeng, Zhang Guangzhao. Study on Permeable Coating for Anticorrosion of Concrete[J]. Paint & Coatings Industry, 2018, 48(1): 1 -5 .
[2] Luo Ping, Liu Zhaohui, Yang Hongbo, Shu Xin, Tao Rui, Zhang Yanan. Effect of Fusion Temperature on Properties of Al-SiC Silicate-Based Ceramic Coating[J]. Paint & Coatings Industry, 2018, 48(1): 6 -10 .
[3] Li Zijun, Liu Shenglin, Geng Gangqiang. Preparation of Polyaniline Microemulsion and Its Application in Waterborne Alkyd Coatings[J]. Paint & Coatings Industry, 2018, 48(1): 11 -16 .
[4] Wang Liuyang, Ye Mengxing, Wang Shan, Liu Fangfang. Preparation and Properties of Polyurethane/Urea Modified by Phenolic Resin[J]. Paint & Coatings Industry, 2018, 48(1): 17 -21 .
[5] Su Guohui, Tang Ying, Cai Wei. Preparation and Performance of Waterborne Sand-Containing Multicolor Coatings[J]. Paint & Coatings Industry, 2018, 48(1): 22 -27 .
[6] Li Yu, Wang Guoqing, Wan Yi, Ding Chunhua, Wang Aimin. Preparation of Silicone Oil Microcapsules with Bionic Antifouling Performance[J]. Paint & Coatings Industry, 2018, 48(1): 28 -36 .
[7] Li Yongyue, Yan Kun, Ma Jinghong, Gong Jinghua. Preparation of Low Friction Polyurethane Composite Coating by Blending[J]. Paint & Coatings Industry, 2018, 48(1): 37 -43 .
[8] Yuan Quan, Liu Huixian, Pan Qihui, Fang Zucheng, Jiang Shengbin, Yang Yucheng. Study on Preparation of UV-Cured Fiber Coatings with Ultra-Low Refractive Index[J]. Paint & Coatings Industry, 2018, 48(1): 44 -47 .
[9] Liu Wei, Su Minchao , Liu Xiaoxuan. Synthesis of Acrylate Resin Modified by Organic Silicon and UV-Curing Kinetics[J]. Paint & Coatings Industry, 2018, 48(1): 48 -53 .
[10] Qi Gang, An Qiufeng, Zhang Qiang. Study on Preparation and Properties of UV-Curable Nano Hybrid Fluorinated Silicone Resin[J]. Paint & Coatings Industry, 2018, 48(1): 54 -58 .
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed