临床肿瘤学杂志

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

晚期非小细胞肺癌二线治疗不同方案的疗效及成本效益分析

张静1,2,刘素1,张洁1,班丽英1,周涛1   

  1. 1 116011 辽宁大连 大连医科大学附属第一医院肿瘤科 2 255036 淄博市中心医院肿瘤科
  • 收稿日期:2012-06-23 修回日期:2012-08-08 出版日期:2012-10-31 发布日期:2012-10-31
  • 通讯作者: 周涛

Effect and cost-efficacy analysis of the secondline treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

ZHANG Jing, LIU Su-qin, ZHANG Jie, BAN Li-ying, ZHOU Tao   

  1. Department of Oncology,the First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian 116011,China
  • Received:2012-06-23 Revised:2012-08-08 Online:2012-10-31 Published:2012-10-31
  • Contact: ZHOU Tao

摘要: 目的 评价多西他赛、培美曲塞、厄洛替尼和吉非替尼4种方案二线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效,并进行成本效益分析。方法 160例晚期NSCLC患者按二线治疗方案分为4组,每组40例。4种方案分别为:多西他赛75mg/m2 iv.,d1;培美曲塞500mg/m2 iv.,d1;厄洛替尼150mg,每日1次;吉非替尼250mg,每日1次。前两组以21天为1周期,共化疗2~6个周期;后两组口服至病情进展或出现无法耐受的不良反应停药。对所有患者进行近期疗效和无进展生存期(PFS)评价,以获得1个单位(1个月)PFS的花费计算4种方案的成本效益比。结果 多西他赛组、培美曲塞组、厄洛替尼组、吉非替尼组有效率分别为7.5%、10.0%、20.0%和22.5%(P=0.165);疾病控制率分别为32.5%、50.0%、65.0%和52.5%(P=0.035);中位PFS分别为2.7个月、2.8个月、3.5个月和3.5个月(P=0.677)。4种方案的3~4级不良反应以多西他赛多见。每获得1个单位PFS,4种方案的花费分别为5635.6、10 279.6、20 814.0和17 587.8元;以多西他赛组为参照,培美曲塞组、厄洛替尼组和吉非替尼组的成本-效益比分别为46 434.7、119 729.4和103 171.0元/月。敏感度分析与成本效益分析的结论一致。结论 多西他赛、培美曲塞、厄洛替尼和吉非替尼4种二线治疗方案治疗晚期NSCLC的疗效未见差异,多西他赛方案的成本-效益比最优;厄洛替尼或吉非替尼治疗的花费高,但不良反应较轻。

Abstract: Objective To evaluate the effect and cost-efficacy of the second-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC)by regimens of docetaxel, pemetrexed,erlotinib and gefitinb. Methods A total of 160 patients with advanced NSCLC were assigned to docetaxel,pemetrexed,erlotinib and gefitinb groups(40 cases in each group). The dosages of the 4 drugs were docetaxel 75mg/m2 dl,pemetrexed 500mg/m2 dl,erlotinib 150 mg/d and gefitinb 250mg/d. The former two regimens were given 2.6 cycles(21 days as a cycle). The later two regimens were given till the disease progressed or intolerant side effect emerged. The effective rate,disease control rate,progress-free survival(PFS) and cost-efficacy ratio were analyzed. Results The effective rate of docetaxel,pemetrexed,erlotinib and gefitinb group was 7.5%,10.0%,20.0% and 22.5%(P=0.165);disease control rate was 32.5%,50.0%,65.0% and 52.5%(P=0.035);median PFS was 2.7,2.8,3.5 and 3.5months (P=0.677);the cost of per unit (1 month)increasing of PFS was 5635.6,10 279.6,20 814.0 and 17 587.8 yuan. Taking docetaxel group as control,the cost-efficacy ratio of pemetrexed,erlotinib and gefitinb group was 46 434.7,119 729.4 and 103 171.0 yuan/month. The sensitivity analysis supported the results of benefit-cost evaluation. Conclusion Docetaxel,pemetrexed,erlotinib and gefitinb have no statistically significance in the second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. Docetaxel had better cost-efficacy. Erlotinib and gefitinb have less side effects but the most expensive cost.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text
195
HTML PDF
Just accepted Online first Issue Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 0 0 0 195

  From Others local
  Times 22 173
  Rate 11% 89%

Abstract
142
Just accepted Online first Issue
0 0 142
  From Others
  Times 142
  Rate 100%

Cited

Web of Science  Crossref   ScienceDirect  Search for Citations in Google Scholar >>
 
This page requires you have already subscribed to WoS.
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!