临床肿瘤学杂志

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同方法检测K-Ras基因突变与转移性结直肠癌疗效及预后的关系

刘晓静,徐建明,宋三泰,葛飞娇,林莉,王岩,刘烈军,李珊珊,刘建芝,付亚莉,姚凯   

  1. 100071 北京 军事医学科学院附属医院消化肿瘤内科
  • 收稿日期:2012-03-09 修回日期:2012-03-22 出版日期:2012-07-31 发布日期:2012-07-31
  • 通讯作者: 徐建明

Correlation between K-Ras mutations in different detections and prognosis of colorectal cancer

LIU Xiao-jing,XU Jian-ming,SONG San-tai,GE Fei-jiao,LIN Li,WANG Yan,LIU Lie-jun,LI Shan-shan,LIU Jian-zhi,FU Ya-li,YAO Kai   

  1. Department of Digestive System Oncology,Affiliated Hospital,Academy of Medical Sciences,Beijing 100071,China
  • Received:2012-03-09 Revised:2012-03-22 Online:2012-07-31 Published:2012-07-31

摘要: 目的 探讨直接测序法和肽核酸钳制PCR(PNA-PCR)法检测K-Ras基因突变状态与转移性结直肠癌患者疗效及预后的相关性。方法 收集110例转移性结直肠癌患者的石蜡包埋肿瘤组织,采用直接测序法和PNA-PCR法分别检测肿瘤组织的K-Ras基因第2外显子第12、13密码子的突变状态,并分析其与患者预后的关系。结果 直接测序法检测到43例K-Ras基因突变,PNA-PCR法除了检测出这些突变之外,还在直接测序法检测的野生型中发现了10例突变。对K-Ras突变状态与患者的预后分析发现,直接测序法检测的K-Ras野生型及突变型患者的中位生存时间(OS)分别为20.5个月和15.6个月(P=0.067)。PNAPCR法检测的野生型和突变型患者的中位OS分别为21.3个月和15.8个月(P=0.014)。两种方法检测的野生型与突变型的有效率和无病进展时间(PFS)差异均无统计学意义。按照这两种方法的检测结果分为3组,高突变组、低突变组和野生型组,仅高突变组与野生型组的OS差异有统计学意义(15.6个月vs.21.3个月,P=0.040)。Cox多因素分析显示,ECOG评分(HR=2.70,95%CI:1.39~5.25,P=0.003)和K-Ras丰度(HR=1.52,95%CI:1.52~2.19,P=0.026)与患者的预后相关。结论 K-Ras突变不是以伊立替康或奥沙利铂为主方案的疗效预测因子。PNA-PCR法检测的K-Ras突变状态与患者的预后有关。建议用PNA-PCR法确定野生型患者,而突变型患者则用直接测序法来确定。

Abstract: Objective To detect K-Ras gene mutations by direct sequencing and peptide nucleic acid clamp PCR assay(PNA-PCR),and analyze the correlation between K-Ras mutations and prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC). MethodsA total of 110 paraffin-embedded mCRC tissues were collected. Direct sequencing and PNA-PCR methods were used to detect 12 and 13 codon mutations of K-Ras gene and analyze the correlations between K-Ras mutations and prognosis. Results Forty-three cases of K-Ras mutation were detected by direct sequencing method. But for the PNA-PCR method,not only these mutations were detected and another 10 cases of mutations were detected. The difference of median overall survival(OS) between wild-type and mutant-type detected by direct sequencing was close to statistical significance (20.5months vs. 15.6months,P=0.067). And for PNAPCR method,the difference was significant(21.3 months vs. 15.8 months,P=0.014). There was no difference of progress free survival(PFS)in both wild-type and mutant-type detected by the two methods. According to the detection of these two methods,110 cases were divided into 3 groups:the high mutation group,the low mutation group and the wild-type group. Only the OS between the wild-type group and low mutation group showed differences(15.6 months vs.21.3 months,P=0.040). Cox regression model showed that ECOG score(HR=2.70,95%CI:1.39-5.25,P=0.003) and K-Ras status(HR=1.52,95%CI:1.52-2.19,P=0.026)were independent factors for prognosis. Conclusion K-Ras mutation is not a efficacy predicting factor for irinotecan or oxaliplatinbased therapies. The K-Ras mutations detected by PNA-PCR method have relation to the OS of patients. For the wild-type,it should be detected by high sensitive methods,such as PNA-PCR method. And the direct sequencing method should be used for mutant-type.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!