临床肿瘤学杂志

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

GEMOX方案联合重组人血管内皮抑素一线治疗晚期胆系肿瘤的初步观察

李 嵘,秦叔逵,刘秀峰,龚新雷,华海清,王 琳,陈映霞

  

  1. 210002 南京 解放军八一医院全军肿瘤中心肿瘤内科
  • 收稿日期:2013-12-19 修回日期:2014-01-30 出版日期:2014-05-31 发布日期:2014-05-31
  • 通讯作者: 刘秀峰

Observation of GEMOX regimen combined with endostar as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma

LI Rong, QIN Shukui,LIU Xiufeng,GONG Xinlei,HUA Haiqing,WANG Lin,CHEN Yingxia.
  

  1. Department of Medical Oncology,Cancer Center of PLA, 81 Hospital of PLA, Nanjing 210002, China
  • Received:2013-12-19 Revised:2014-01-30 Online:2014-05-31 Published:2014-05-31
  • Contact: LIU Xiufeng

摘要: 目的 观察吉西他滨(GEM)、奥沙利铂(OXA)联合重组人血管内皮抑素(恩度)一线治疗晚期胆系肿瘤(BTCs)的疗效及安全性。方法 回顾性分析2009年1月至2013年8月ⅣB期BTCs患者 48例,分为联合组(n=20)和单纯化疗组(n=28)。联合组:吉西他滨1000mg/m2静滴,d1、d8;奥沙利铂 100mg/m2 静滴 d2,3周为1周期;恩度 15mg 静滴 d1~d14,3周为1周期。单纯化疗组仅给予GEMOX方案化疗,剂量与使用方法同联合组。2个周期后按照RECIST11标准评价近期疗效,参考KPS变化评价生活质量(QoL),根据NCI CTC30标准评价不良反应,并观察疾病进展时间(TTP)和总生存时间(OS)。结果 联合组获CR 1例、PR 3例、SD 12例、PD 4例,有效率(RR)为200%,疾病控制率(DCR)为80.0%;中位TTP为8.6个月,中位OS为14.0个月;QoL改善稳定率为80.0%。单纯化疗组获CR 1例、PR 5例、SD 15例、PD 7例,RR 为21.5%,DCR 为75.0%;中位TTP为 6.0个月,中位OS 为10.0个月; QoL改善稳定率为71.4%。两组中位TTP和OS的差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组最常见的不良反应为骨髓抑制,其他不良反应包括恶心呕吐、肝功能损害、外周神经炎、皮肤过敏反应等,以1~2级为主,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。化疗联合恩度组仅2例出现心电图T波改变,1例出现房性早搏,1例出现轻度血压升高。结论 GEMOX联合恩度方案一线治疗转移性BTCs疗效较好,可以改善或稳定QoL,延长生存时间,且耐受性较好,值得临床推广使用和进一步深入观察。

Abstract: Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of endostar combined with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin as the firstline treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma. Methods Forty-eight patients from Jan. 2009 to Aug. 2013 confirmed with pathologic and imaging examination as stage ⅣB primary biliary tract carcinoma were reviewed. Twenty cases received endostar+GEMOX regimen and 28 cases were applied with GEMOX regimen alone. GEMOX regimen was given as follow: gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 iv, d1,d8; oxaliplatin 100mg/m2 iv, d2, 21 days was a cycle. Endostar was given 15mg iv d1-d14, 21 days was a cycle. The efficacy was evaluated strictly after 2 cycles according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, quality of life(QoL)was evaluated accoding to karnofsky scores,safety was evaluated after 1 cycle according to NCI CTC 3.0 version criteria. The time to progress(TTP)and overall survival(OS) were also observed. Results In GEMOX+endostar group, 1 was in CR,3 in PR,12 in SD, and 4 in PD; the response rate(RR)was 20.0%, disease control rate(DCR)was 80.0%; median TTP was 8.6 months and the median OS was 14.0 months; the QoL improved and stable rate was 80.0%. In GEMOX group, 1 was in CR,5 in PR,15 in SD, and 7 in PD; RR was 21.5%, and DCR was 75.0%; the median TTP was 6.0 months and the median OS was 10.0 months; the QoL improved and stable rate was 71.4%. There was statistical difference in TTP and OS between the two groups(P<0.05). The most common toxicity in the two groups were myelosuppression, other main toxicities included nause/vommiting, liver dysfaction, peripheral nearitis, skin allergy reaction and etc, mainly in grade 1-2, and there were no sugnificant differences between the two groups(P>0.05). In GEMOX+endostar group, only 2 case of non-specific T wave changed. One case was of auricular flutter, and 1 case with mild hypertension. Conclusion GEMOX+endostar as the first-line treatment for advanced BTCs has good efficacy, may improve or stabilize the patients QoL and prolong survival, and the toxicities are well-tolerated, which worth clinical use and further observation.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!