临床肿瘤学杂志

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

伊立替康联合顺铂对比伊立替康单药二线治疗晚期胃癌的临床研究

李建旺,黄春珍,元建华,陈琼慧,刘英平,张曙波   

  1. 570208 海口 中南大学湘雅医学院附属海口医院 海口市人民医院肿瘤科
  • 收稿日期:2016-01-08 修回日期:2016-04-21 出版日期:2016-06-30 发布日期:2016-06-30

Clinical study of irinotecan plus cisplatin regimen versus irinotecan alone as secondline chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer

LI Jiangwang, HUANG Chunzhen, YUAN Jianhua, CHEN Qionghui, LIU Yingping, ZHANG Shubo   

  1. Department of Oncology,People’s Hospital of Haikou,Xiangya Haikou Hospital of Central South University,Haikou 570208,China
  • Received:2016-01-08 Revised:2016-04-21 Online:2016-06-30 Published:2016-06-30

摘要: 目的 探讨伊立替康(CPT-11)联合顺铂(DDP)方案与CPT-11单药治疗晚期胃癌的疗效、远期生存和毒副反应。方法 收集2012年6月至2014年1月复治晚期胃腺癌患者168例,随机分为CPT-11+DDP组(n=84)和CPT-11组(n=84)。CPT-11联合DDP方案:CPT-11 250 mg/m2静滴,d1;DDP 70 mg/m2静滴,d1,21天为1周期。CPT-11方案:CPT-11 250 mg/m2 d1静滴,21天为1周期。化疗2个周期后进行近期疗效评价,并比较两组的远期生存和不良反应。结果168例均可评价疗效。CPT-11+DDP组获CR 3例、PR 11例、SD 44例,有效率(RR)为167%,疾病控制率(DCR)为890%。CPT-11组获CR 1例、PR 12例、SD 41例,RR 为155%,DCR 为643%。两组RR和DCR的差异均无统计学意义(P=0834,P=0513)。CPT-11+DDP组和CPT-11组的无进展生存期分别为46个月和41个月(P=0522),中位总生存期分别为138个月和125个月(P=0185)。亚组分析显示,在肠型腺癌中CPT-11+DDP组的中位总生存期优于CPT-11组(156个月vs. 136个月,P=0.016)。CPT-11+DDP组3~4级贫血、肝功能损害以及1~4级肾功能损害的发生率高于CPT-11组,而CPT-11组1~4级便秘和口腔黏膜炎的发生率均高于CPT-11+DDP组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 CPT-11联合DDP方案较单药CPT-11方案二线治疗晚期胃癌并未带来生存获益,但对于晚期肠型胃癌具有优势,且安全性良好,值得进一步深入观察。

Abstract: Objective To investigate the therapeutic effect, long term survival and side effects on advanced gastric cancer patients treated with irinotecan(CPT-11) plus cisplatin(DDP) regimen and CPT-11 alone as secondline chemotherapy. Methods A total of 168 gastric cancer patients enrolled from June 2012 to January 2014 failed in firstline chemotherapy were randomly allocated to CPT-11+DDP group(CPT-11 250mg/m2 iv, d1; DDP 70 mg/m2 iv, d1, 21 days as a cycle) or CPT-11 group(250 mg/m2 iv,d1,21 days as a cycle) with 68 cases in each group. Short-term efficacy was evaluated after 2 cycles’ therapy, and long-term efficacy, as well as side effects was compared between both groups. Results Efficacy could be evaluated in 168 cases. In CPT-11+DDP group,there were 3 cases in CR, 11 in PR, 44 in SD, and the response rate(RR) and disease control rate(DCR) were 167% and 890%. In CPT-11 group, there were 1 case in CR, 12 in PR, 41 in SD,and RR, DCR were 155% and 643%. The difference of RR and DCR had no significance between both groups(P=0.834, P=0.513). The median progressionfree survival were 4.6 and 4.1 months in CPT-11+DDP group and CPT-11 group(P=0.522), and the median overall survival(OS) were 13.8 and 12.5 months, respectively(P=0.185). The incidences of grade 3-4 anemia, grade 3-4 liver impairment and grade 1-4 kidney impairment were higher in CPT-11+DDP group than in CPT-11 group(P<0.05). The incidences of grade 1-4 constipation and mucositis were lower in CPT-11/DDP group than in CPT-11group(P<0.05). Subgroup analysis revealed that the median OS of CPT-11/DDP group was significantly better than that of CPT-11 group(15.6 months vs. 13.6 months, P=0.016). Conclusion Compared with CPT-11monotherapy,CPT-11/DDP regimen shows no survival benefit as second-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer. However, intestinal type of gastric cancer can benefit from CPT-11/DDP regimen,and side effects are well tolerated,worthy of further observation.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!