临床肿瘤学杂志

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

长春瑞滨联合卡培他滨或替吉奥治疗紫杉类及蒽环类耐药晚期乳腺癌的效果分析

祝朝富1,李卓虹1,安佰平1,李丹1,蓝兰1,黄洪婕2   

  1. 1 成都中医药大学附属医院肿瘤科 2 成都中医药大学附属医院院感科
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-14 修回日期:2017-01-17 出版日期:2017-03-31 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 通讯作者: 黄洪婕

Clinical observation for the comparison of vinorelbine combined with capecitabine or S-1 for advanced breast cancer patients after anthracyclinetaxane failure

ZHU Chaofu, LI Zhuohong, AN Baiping, LI Dan, LAN Lan, HUANG Hongjie.   

  1. Department of Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
  • Received:2016-11-14 Revised:2017-01-17 Online:2017-03-31 Published:2018-06-06
  • Contact: HUANG Hongjie

摘要: 目的 比较长春瑞滨(NVB)联合卡培他滨(XLD)或替吉奥(S-1)治疗蒽环类及紫杉类耐药的晚期乳腺癌患者的临床疗效及不良反应。方法 收集2012年6月至2014年6月于本院肿瘤内科住院的对紫杉类及蒽环类耐药的晚期乳腺癌患者64例,其中33例患者接受NVB联合XLD方案(NX组),31例患者接受NVB联合S-1方案(NS组)。NX组具体方案为:NVB 25 mg/m2静脉滴注,d1、d8;XLD 2000 mg/m2,分2次口服,d1~d14。NS组的具体方案为:NVB 25 mg/m2静脉滴注,d1、d8;S1 40 mg(体表面积≤125 m2)、50 mg(125 m2<体表面积<15 m2)或60 mg(体表面积≥1.5 m2),口服,每日2次,d1~d14。两组均21天为1周期。2个周期后采用实体瘤疗效评价标准(RECIST)1.1版评价近期疗效,采用美国国立癌症研究所毒性判定标准(NCI-CTCAE)4.0评价毒性反应,同时随访患者的生存情况。结果 全组64例患者均可评价疗效,其中NX组33例患者中获CR 3例,PR 13例,SD 12例,PD 5例,有效率(RR)和疾病控制率(DCR)分别为485%和848%;NS组31例患者中获CR 3例,PR 13例,SD 8例,PD 7例,RR和DCR分别为516%和774%。两组RR和DCR的差异无统计学意义(P>005)。NX组的中位无进展生存期为7.8个月,与NS组的7.2个月比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组的主要不良反应为骨髓抑制和消化道反应,以1~2级为主,均可耐受。NX组手足综合征的发生率高于NS组(45.5% vs. 16.1%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 NVB联合XLD或S-1治疗蒽环类及紫杉类耐药的晚期乳腺癌的疗效相当,毒副反应较轻且均可耐受,NVB联合S-1的手足综合征发生率较低,两种方案均值得临床推广。

Abstract: Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of vinorelbine (NVB) plus capecitabine (XLD) and vinorelbine (NVB) plus compound tegafur capsule (S-1) in advanced breast cancer patients after anthracyclinetaxane failure. Methods From June 2012 to June 2014, 64 metastatic breast cancer patients with anthracycline-taxane failure from our hospital were enrolled. According to the treatment regimes, 33 patients received NVB plus XLD regime (NX group) and 31 patients received NVB plus S-1 regime (NS group). All patients in NX group were given 25 mg/m2 of NVB on day 1 and 8 plus 2 000 mg/m2 of XLD daily from day 1 to 14. All patients in NS group received 25 mg/m2 of NVB at day 1 and day 8 plus oral S-1 twice every day from day 1 to 14. The dose of S-1 was determined according to the body surface area as follows:≤1.25 m2, 40 mg; 1.25 to <1.5 m2, 50 mg; and≥1.5 m2, 60 mg. Three weeks was a cycle. Response to chemotherapy was assessed by RECIST criteria 1.1 after 2 cycles. Toxicity was evaluated according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v4.0. Patients were followed up for survival.
Results All the 64 patients were evaluable for response. In NX group, there were 3 cases of CR, 13 cases of PR, 12 cases of SD and 5 cases of PD with the response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) of 48.5% and 84.8%. In NS group, there were 3 cases of CR, 13 cases of PR, 8 cases of SD and 7 cases of PD with RR and DCR of 51.6% and 77.4%. No significant difference was observed on RR and DCR between both groups (P>0.05). The median progressionfree survival were 7.8 months and 7.2 months in the NX group and NS group, and there was no significant difference between both group (P>0.05). The main adverse reactions of both groups were myelosuppression and digestive tract reaction, mainly of grade 1-2, which could be tolerated. The incidence of hand foot syndrome in group NX was higher than that in NS group (45.5% vs. 16.1%), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion Similar clinical efficacy is achieved in the therapy of metastatic breast cancer with NVB plus XLD or S-1. The side effects are mild and tolerable, and the incidence of hand foot syndrome is lower in NVB plus S-1 regimen. Both regimens were worthy of clinical promotion.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!