临床肿瘤学杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (1): 52-59.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

替吉奥联合奥沙利铂一线治疗转移性结直肠癌有效性与安全性的Meta分析#br#

  


  1. 400016重庆重庆医科大学第一附属医院肿瘤科
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-23 修回日期:2017-10-17 出版日期:2018-01-30 发布日期:2018-06-28

A metaanalysis of the efficacy and safety of S1 combined with oxaliplatin for metastatic colorectal cancer#br#
#br#

  1. Department of Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
  • Received:2017-08-23 Revised:2017-10-17 Online:2018-01-30 Published:2018-06-28

摘要: 目的 评价替吉奥联合奥沙利铂(SOX)一线治疗转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的有效性和安全性。方法 通过The Cochrane Library、PubMed、EMBASE和MEDLINE、中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据库等检索SOX方案一线治疗mCRC的多中心随机对照试验(RCT),用Rev Man 53版软件进行Meta分析。结果 共纳入5项临床多中心RCT,合计1382例mCRC患者。Meta分析结果显示,与奥沙利铂联合其他氟尿嘧啶类化疗药物比较,SOX方案在无进展生存期(HR=0.90,95%CI:0.80~1.02,P=0.10)、总生存期(HR=1.14,95%CI:0.98~1.31,P=0.08)、客观缓解率(RR=1.12,95%CI:0.87~1.43,P=0.38)、疾病控制率(RR=104,95%CI:0.98~110,P=0.24)的差异均无统计学意义。3~4 级不良反应:SOX方案组的白细胞减少发生率低于奥沙利铂联合其他氟尿嘧啶类药物(P<0.05),而口腔黏膜反应、厌食、腹泻的发生率高于奥沙利铂联合其他氟尿嘧啶类药物(P<0.05),两种方案在中性粒细胞减少、血小板减少、贫血、恶心、呕吐、乏力不良反应的发生率方面差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 OX一线治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与奥沙利铂联合其他氟尿嘧啶类药物的疗效相似,不良反应不同,替吉奥有可能成为除卡培他滨外口服氟尿嘧啶类一线治疗晚期结直肠癌的另一种选择。

关键词: 转移性结直肠癌, 替吉奥, 化学治疗, Meta分析

Abstract: ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of S1 combined with oxaliplatin as firstline treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer(mCRC). 
MethodsA wide search of randomized clinical trials (RCT)using S1 combined with oxaliplatin as a firstline therapy for mCRC patients was performed in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, CNKI and WanFang databases. All included studies were assessed according to the guidance of the Cochrane Collaborations tool for assessing risk of bias of RCTs, and then statistical analyses were performed using Rev Man 53 software. 
ResultsA total of 5 RCTs involving 1382 patients were included. Meta analysis indicated that the progressionfree survival(HR=0.90,95%CI:0.801.02,P=0.10), overall survival(HR=1.14,95%CI:0.981.31,P=0.08), objective response rate(RR=1.12,95%CI:0.871.43,P=0.38), disease control rate(RR=104,95%CI:0.981.10,P=0.24), showed no statistical significance between S1 combined with oxaliplatin and oxaliplatin combined with 5FU or capecitabine. For side effects, S-1 combined with oxaliplatin could decrease incidence of grade 34 leukopenia, but increased the incidence of grade 3.4 stomatitis, anorexia, diarrhea. There were no statistical difference between the two regimen in the incidence of neutropenia, anemia, thrombocytopenia, nausea, vomiting and fatigue. 
ConclusionS1 combined with oxaliplatin seem to have similar efficacy in the firstline treatment for mCRC with different toxicity. The S-1 may offer an alternative to 5-FU.


Key words: Metastatic colorectal cancer, S-1, Chemotherapy, Metaanalysis

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘琳1,郑英慧1,韩力1,秦叔逵2. 含奥沙利铂系统化疗方案治疗晚期原发性肝癌有效性和安全性的前瞻性研究荟萃分析[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2015, 20(9): 769 .
[2]

高 俊,邱秀娟,汤建军,王 俊,周 东,李恒平

. miRNA-196a2 rs116149131基因多态性与胃癌患病风险的Meta分析[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2016, 21(9): 789 .
[3] 高子夜1,刘佩2,刘晓波3
. 胃癌组织中SOX2表达及其临床病理特征的Meta分析[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2017, 22(3): 243 .
[4] 王倩,谭诗云
. XRCC1 Arg399Gln基因多态性与中国人群肝细胞癌易感性的Meta分析[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2017, 22(4): 319 .
[5] 张芷毓,秦叔逵. 榄香烯乳注射液联合常规化疗药物治疗恶性浆膜腔积液有效性与安全性的系统评价[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2017, 22(9): 797 .