临床肿瘤学杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (6): 481-488.

• •    下一篇

微小RNA320靶向FOXM1调控食管鳞癌放射敏感性的机制研究#br#


  

  1. 南京南京医科大学第一附属医院 江苏省人民医院放疗科
  • 出版日期:2018-06-30 发布日期:2018-08-29

Effects of microRNA320 on the targeted regulation of FOXM1 and radiosensitivity of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University
  • Online:2018-06-30 Published:2018-08-29

摘要: 目的探讨微小RNA320(miR320)对食管鳞癌(ESCC)放射敏感性的影响及可能机制。
方法采用实时荧光定量PCR(QPCR)检测正常食管上皮细胞株HEEC和ESCC细胞株KYSE150、TE13和 Eca109中miR320和叉头框蛋白M1(FOXM1)的表达水平。采用脂质体法将miR320 模拟物(mimics)及其阴性对照(NC)转染至Eca109细胞,分为转染组和对照组。QPCR和Western blotting检测miR320 mimics转染后FOXM1的蛋白和mRNA水平以评价miR320对FOXM1的调控作用。克隆形成实验评价克隆形成能力;免疫荧光实验检测γH2AX荧光焦点数;Annexin ⅤFITC/PI双染法测定细胞凋亡;Western blotting测定XIAP、Bax、Bcl2和cleaved caspase3的表达水平;采用双荧光素酶报告基因实验验证miR320与FOXM1之间的靶向关系。
结果QPCR检测显示,Eca109细胞中miR320相对表达量最低,FOXM1相对表达量最高,故选取该细胞株进行后续实验。转染48 h后,转染组miR320表达量显著高于对照组;QPCR和Western blotting检测发现转染组FOXM1 mRNA和蛋白水平均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<005)。与对照组相比,转染组Eca109细胞克隆形成能力显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P<005);转染组照射处理后1、6、24 h γH2AX焦点数增加,差异有统计学意义(P<005)。转染组Eca109细胞的凋亡率高于对照组(P<005)。与对照组比较,转染组Bax和cleaved caspase3表达增加,XIAP和Bcl2表达降低,差异有统计学意义(P<005)。在野生型 FOXM13’UTR质粒转染细胞中,miR320 mimics转染组Eca109细胞的荧光素酶活性明显低于对照组(P<005);而在突变型质粒转染细胞中,两组细胞的荧光素酶活性的差异无统计学意义(P>005)。
结论miR320能增强ESCC细胞放射敏感性,可能与靶向抑制FOXM1表达有关

关键词: 食管鳞癌, 放射敏感性, 微小RNA320(miR320), 叉头框蛋白M1(FOXM1)

Abstract: ObjectiveTo investigate the mechanism of microRNA320(miR320) in regulating radiosensitivity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC) cells. 
MethodsRealtime fluorescence quantitative PCR(QPCR) was used to detect the expressions of miR320 and forkhead box protein M1(FOXM1) in normal esophageal epithelial cells HEEC and ESCC cell lines of KYSE150, TE13 and Eca109. MiR320 mimics and its negative control (NC) were transfected into Eca109 cells by Lipofectamine 2000 and assigned to miR320 transfection group and control group, respectively. QPCR and Western blotting were used to detect the mRNA and protein levels of FOXM1 to evaluate the regulatory effect of miR320. Clone formation assay and immunofluorescence assay were performed to evaluate the cloneforming ability of Eca109 and the formation of γH2AX. The apoptotic rates of Eca109 cells were detected by flow cytometry and the expression levels of XIAP, Bax, Bcl2 and cleaved caspase3 were detected by Western blotting. Dual luciferase reporter assay was performed to verify the targeting relationship between miR320 and FOXM1. 
ResultsCompared with HEEC cells, the expression of miR320 in Eca109 cells was the lowest, while the expression of FOXM1 was the highest(P<005), and Eca109 cells were chosen for the following experiments. Fortyeight hours after transfection, transfection group showed an increased miR320 expression compared with control group; and the mRNA and protein levels of FOXM1 in transfection group were both lower than control group(P<005). The colonyforming ability of Eca109 cells in transfection group was lower than that in control group(P<005).The number of γH2AX foci in transfection group at 1, 6 and 24 h after irradiation were significantly higher than those in control group(P<005). The apoptotic rate of Eca109 cells in transfection group was significantly higher than that in control group(P<005). Compared with control group, the expression of Bax and cleaved caspase3 increased and the expression of XIAP and Bcl2 were decreased in transfection group(P<005). The luciferase activity of Eca109 cells transfected with wildtype FOXM1 3’UTR plasmid and miR320 mimics was significantly lower than that of transfected with NC. No significant difference was observed between cells transfected with mutanttype FOXM1 3’UTR plasmid. 
ConclusionmiR320 may enhance the radiosensitivity of ESCC cells and the underlying mechanism may associated with inhibition of FOXM1.

Key words: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, Radiosensitivity, MicroRNA320(miR320), Forkhead box protein M1(FOXM1)

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!