临床肿瘤学杂志

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

索拉非尼联合GEMOX方案治疗晚期肝细胞癌的临床疗效及预后分析

林顺欢,刘 淳,江冠铭,郑锐年   

  1. 523059 广东东莞 东莞市人民医院肿瘤内科
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-16 修回日期:2015-05-07 出版日期:2015-06-30 发布日期:2015-06-30

Therapeutic effect and prognosis of sorafenib combined with GEMOX regimen in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

LIN Shunhuan, LIU Chun, JIANG Guanming, ZHENG Ruinian.

  

  1. Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguan People's Hospital, Dongguan 523059, China
  • Received:2015-03-16 Revised:2015-05-07 Online:2015-06-30 Published:2015-06-30

摘要: 目的 探讨索拉非尼联合GEMOX方案(吉西他滨+奥沙利铂)治疗晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效和安全性。方法收集本院2009年3月至2013年4月收治的53例晚期HCC患者,根据化疗方案分为A组(n=26,索拉非尼400 mg/次,2次/日)和B组(n=27,索拉非尼400 mg/次,2次/日;吉西他滨1000 mg/m2,d1、d8;奥沙利铂100 mg/m2,d2;21天为1周期)。按照实体瘤的疗效评价标准(RECIST)1.1和美国国立癌症研究所通用毒性反应标准(NCI-CTC)30版标准评价疗效及不良反应,采用Kaplan-Meier法进行生存分析。结果 全组53例患者均可评价疗效。两组均无CR病例,其中A组获PR 2例,SD 7例,PD 17例,有效率(RR)和疾病控制率(DCR)分别为7.7%和34.6%;B组获PR 4例,SD 9例,PD 14例,RR和DCR分别为14.8%和48.1%,两组RR和DCR的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。A组的中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为4.5个月和8.4个月,B组的中位PFS和OS分别为6.7个月和13.8个月,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组的主要不良反应为手足综合征、高血压、腹泻,未见骨髓抑制,而B组的最常见毒副反应为骨髓抑制,表现为白细胞和血小板减少(以1~2级为主),且白细胞减少、血小板减少及血红蛋白减少的发生率均高于A组;两组非血液性毒性主要为恶心呕吐和肝功损害。肾功损害、皮疹、外周神经炎等方面的毒性少见。结论 索拉非尼治疗中晚期肝癌安全有效,不良反应多数患者可耐受;索拉非尼联合GEMOX方案能给晚期HCC患者带来生存获益。

Abstract: Objective To explore the therapeutic effect and safety of sorafenib combined with GEMOX regimen in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods In a retrospective analysis, 53 HCC patients in our hospital from March 2009 to April 2013 were assigned to receive sorafenib alone (Group A, n=26) or in combination with GEMOX regimen (Group B, n=27). The curative effect was analyzed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. The National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTC) version 3.0 was employed to evaluate the adverse reaction. Survival analysis was performed using KaplanMeier method. Results All the 53 patients were evaluable for evaluation. There were no CR cases in both groups. In Group A, there were 2 cases of PR, 7 cases of SD and 17 cases of PD with the response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR) of 7.7% and 34.6%. In Group B, there were 4 cases of PR, 9 cases of SD and 14 cases of PD with RR and DCR of 14.8% and 48.1%. No significant differences were observed between 2 groups (P>0.05). The median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 4.5 months and 8.4 months in group B, higher than 6.7 and 13.8 months in Group A with statistically significant difference (P<0.05). The main adverse reactions were hand foot syndrome, hypertension and diarrhea in Group A without bone marrow suppression. The most common adverse reactions in group B were bone marrow suppression, manifested as grade 1-2 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. There were higher incidences of leucopenia, thrombocytopenia and hemoglobin decrease in Group B versus Group A. The major non hematologic toxicity of 2 groups was nausea and vomiting and liver damage. The renal damage, skin rash and peripheral neuritis were rare. Conclusion Sorafenib combined with GEMOX regimen is safe and effective for treatment of advanced HCC and most patients are tolerable. It can bring survival benefit to patients with advanced HCC.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!