临床肿瘤学杂志

• 论著 • 上一篇    下一篇

乳腺癌保乳术后同步推量放疗与常规放疗近期疗效的临床研究

曹茜,阿迪娜•贾库林,王义海,司马义力•买买提尼牙孜,木妮热•木沙江   

  1. 830011 乌鲁木齐 新疆医科大学附属肿瘤医院乳腺放疗科
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-14 修回日期:2016-08-15 出版日期:2016-10-30 发布日期:2016-10-30

Clinical study on the short-term effect of simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy and conventional radiotherapy for early breast cancer patients

CAO Qian, JIAKULIN Adina, WANG Yihai, MAIMAITINIYAZI Simayili, MUSHAJIANG Munire.   

  1. Department of Breast Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830011, China
  • Received:2016-04-14 Revised:2016-08-15 Online:2016-10-30 Published:2016-10-30

摘要: 目的 探讨早期乳腺癌保乳术后不同放疗方式的疗效及危及器官受照射体积。方法选取本院2012年6月至2012年12月接受保乳术的早期乳癌患者70例,其中35例行瘤床同步推量放疗(SIB组),其余35例患者行常规放疗(CRT组)。观察两组患者的放疗反应(急性和晚期皮肤反应、骨髓抑制情况、咽部及消化道反应),比较两组的美容效果、治疗时间及肿瘤的局部控制情况。应用三维治疗计划系统比较SIB与CRT计划下危及器官的受照射体积。结果 SIB组的急性和晚期皮肤反应的总发生率均高于CRT组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);SIB组的美容优良率为82.9%(29/35),而CRT组的美容优良率为77.1%(27/35),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);SIB组的平均住院时间为(39.74±1.55)天,CRT组为(45.60±2.35)天,SIB组在放射治疗住院时间短于CRT组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);SIB组较CRT组降低了肺V20,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。至随访截止日期,所有患者均生存,两组局部控制率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 SIB相比于CRT在早期乳腺癌保乳术后有相当的美容效果及局部控制率。SIB缩短治疗时间,降低了肺受到20 Gy剂量照射时的体积,可推广应用于乳腺癌保乳术后的患者。

Abstract: Objective To explore the curative effect and irradiated volume of organs at risk (OAR) of two radiotherapy(RT) techniques for breast cancer patients after conservative surgery. Methods From June 2012 to December 2012,70 early breast cancer patients were enrolled in this study with 35 patients in the simultaneous integrated boost intensity modulated radiotherapy (SIB) group and other 35 patients in the conventional radiotherapy (CRT) group. The toxicity effects,including acute and late skin reaction,bone marrow suppression, pharyngeal and digestive tract reaction were observed. The cosmetic effect, treatment time and local control of tumor were compared between both groups. Meanwhile, the three dimensional treatment planning system was used to compare the irradiated volume of OAR under SIB and CRT plan. Results The incidences of acute and chronic skin reactions were higher in SIB group versus CRT group(P<0.05). The cosmetic satisfactory rate of SIB group was 82.9% (29/35), similar with the 77.1% (27/35) of CRT group (P>0.05). The duration of hospitalization of SIB group was (39.74±1.55) d, shorter than (45.60±2.35) d of CRT group with significant difference (P<0.05). Compared with CRT group,there were lower pulmonary V20 in SIB group(P<0.05). Until the follow-up date,all patients were survival. There was no significant difference in the local control rate between both groups. ConclusionIn the early breast cancer after breast conserving surgery, SIB has considerable cosmetic effect and local control rate as CRT. SIB shortened the treatment time, reduced the volume of lung irradiated at 20 Gy,and can be used in patients with breast cancer after breast conserving surgery.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!