腹腔镜,直肠癌,肠系膜下动脉,淋巴结清扫," /> 腹腔镜,直肠癌,肠系膜下动脉,淋巴结清扫,"/> Laparoscope,Rectal cancer,Inferior mesenteric artery,Lymph node dissection,"/> 两种不同观察孔位置在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中的应用效果#br# <div> #br# </div>

临床肿瘤学杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (8): 730-734.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

两种不同观察孔位置在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中的应用效果#br#
#br#

  

  1. 上海上海中医药大学附属曙光医院胃肠外科
  • 出版日期:2018-08-31 发布日期:2018-09-07

Comparison of the application effect of two different laparoscope sites in laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer#br#
#br#

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Affiliated Shanghai Shuguang Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
  • Online:2018-08-31 Published:2018-09-07

摘要: 目的比较右侧和中央两种不同观察孔位置在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中对肠系膜下动脉根部淋巴结清扫显露的临床效果。
方法回顾性分析2017年1月至2017年5月于上海中医药大学附属曙光医院胃肠外科行腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的25例患者的临床资料,清扫肠系膜下动脉淋巴结时分别采用右侧观察孔(右上Trocar)和中央观察孔(脐上Trocar)显露,其中右侧观察孔组13例,中央观察孔组12例。对比两组手术视野、总手术时间、实际淋巴结清扫时间(即自系膜切开至D3淋巴结清扫完成的时间)、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数目、中转开腹率及术后早期并发症发生率,两组手术均由同组医师完成。
结果右侧观察孔较中央观察孔更易于显露肠系膜下动脉及神经走行,手术均无中转,右侧观察孔和中央观察孔两组患者实际淋巴结清扫时间分别为(280±59)min 和(331±61)min,差异有统计学意义(P=0045);总手术时间分别为(1403±167)min 和(1464±169)min,术中出血量分别为(596±176)ml 和(633±144)ml,淋巴结清扫数目分别为(184±38)枚和(162±31)枚,术后住院时间分别为(82±22)天 和(83±21)天,术后早期并发症发生率分别为77%(1/13)和167%(2/12),以上差异均无统计学意义(P>005)。
结论在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中,右侧观察孔较中央观察孔更有利于手术野的显露,在肠系膜下动脉根部淋巴结清扫、分支血管保留及神经保护中具有优势。


关键词: 腹腔镜')">">腹腔镜, 直肠癌, 肠系膜下动脉, 淋巴结清扫

Abstract: Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Affiliated Shanghai Shuguang Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese MedicineObjectiveTo compare the application effect of right laparoscope site versus central laparoscope site on clearing peripheral lymph node of inferior mesenteric arterial root in laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer. 
MethodsThe clinical data of 25 patients underwent laparoscopic radical resection of rectal cancer between January 2017 and May 2017 at the Affiliated Shanghai Shuguang Hospital of Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine were analyzed retrospectively. The right laparoscope site (laparoscope inserted through the right superior trocar) and central laparoscope site(laparoscope inserted through the superior umbilical trocar) were applied respectively when the peripheral lymph nodes of inferior mesenteric arterial root were dissected. There were 13 cases in the right laparoscope site group and 12 cases in the central laparoscope site group. The exposure effect of surgical field, the operation time, the time from the first incision on the mesentery to accomplish the D3 lymph node dissection, the blood loss, the number of dissected lymph nodes, the conversion rate, the postoperative hospital stay and the early postoperative complications were compared between both groups. All the operations were performed by the same surgical team. 
ResultsThe right laparoscope site was easier to expose the inferior mesenteric artery and nerve. There was no conversion. The mean time from the first incision on the mesentery to accomplish the D3 lymph node dissection were (280±59)min and(331±61)min for the right laparoscope site group and the central laparoscope site group, and there was statistically significant difference(P=0045). The mean operation time were (1403±167)min and (1464±169)min, the mean blood loss were (596±176)ml and (633±144)ml, the mean numbers of dissected lymph nodes were 184±38 and 162±31, the postoperative hospital stay were (82±22) days and (83±21)days, and the early postoperative complication rates were 77%(1/13) and 167%(2/12), with no statistically significant differences between both groups(P>005). 
ConclusionThe right laparoscope site has advantages for exposure of surgical field, lymph node dissection of inferior mesenteric arterial root, preservation of branches of inferior mesenteric artery and protection of inferior mesenteric nerve plexus.


Key words: Laparoscope')">">Laparoscope, Rectal cancer, Inferior mesenteric artery, Lymph node dissection

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!