Breast cancer,Breast-conserving surgery,X-ray,Electronic line,Intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT),Immune function ,"/> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align:justify;"> X射线调强放疗对乳腺癌保乳术后远期生存及免疫功能影响的临床观察

临床肿瘤学杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (2): 158-162.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

X射线调强放疗对乳腺癌保乳术后远期生存及免疫功能影响的临床观察

  

  1. 1  210000  南京  东部战区空军医院妇产科

    2  210000  东部战区空军医院普外科

    3  210000  东部战区空军医院肿瘤科

  • 收稿日期:2018-07-18 修回日期:2018-11-16 出版日期:2019-02-28 发布日期:2019-03-18

Clinical observation on the long-term survival and immune function of breast-conserving surgery with X-ray intensity-modulated radiotherapy

  1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Eastern Theater Air Force Hospital, Nanjing 210000,China

  • Received:2018-07-18 Revised:2018-11-16 Online:2019-02-28 Published:2019-03-18

摘要:

目的 分析X射线调强放疗对乳腺癌保乳术后远期生存及免疫功能的影响。方法 选择254例行保乳术的乳腺癌患者分为观察组(n=147)和对照组(n=147),两组术后均采取全乳腺照射50 Gy/25次。在瘤体补量上,对照组采用电子线放疗,观察组采用X射线调强放疗,处方剂量均为10~16 Gy/5~8次。比较两组靶区及心脏、患侧肺剂量学参数,毒副反应,5年无瘤生存率,5年生存率及放疗前后的T细胞亚群水平。结果 两组靶区V95%差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组V105%为(11.26±2.59)%、V110%为(3.15±0.84)%、心脏照射剂量为(3.72±1.16)Gy、患侧肺照射剂量为(7.51±2.06)Gy,对照组分别为(43.15±3.59)%、(11.36±1.16)%、(8.54±1.92)Gy、(11.62±3.78)Gy,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组急性皮肤反应、晚期皮肤反应、骨髓抑制、放射性肺炎及放射性食管炎发生率差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组5年无瘤生存率为98.55%,高于对照组的94.16%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组5年生存率为95.65%,对照组为94.89%,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。放疗后观察组CD+3、CD+4、CD+4/CD+8水平低于对照组,CD8水平高于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论  乳腺癌保乳术后X射线调强放疗可获得更佳的无瘤生存,对免疫功能影响小,可能与瘤床靶区剂量分布均匀、减少心脏和患侧肺照射剂量有关,值得临床推广应用。

关键词: 乳腺癌, 保乳手术, X射线, 电子线, 调强放疗, 免疫功能

Abstract: Objective  To analyze the effect of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) on long-term survival and immune function after breast conserving surgery for breast cancer. Methods Two hundred and fifty-four breast-conserving breast cancer patients were divided into observation group (n=147) and control group (n=147). The patients were treated with whole breast irradiation 50 Gy/25 times after operation. In the supplementary radiotherapy of tumors, the control group was treated with electronic radiation, while the observation group was treated with X-ray IMRT. The prescription doses were 10-16 Gy/5-8 times. Dosimetry of target area, dosimetry of heart, dosimetry of affected lung, side effects, 5-year disease-free survival rate, 5-year survival rate and T cell subsets before and after radiotherapy were compared between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in V95% of target area of the tumor bed between the two groups (P>0.05). The V105%, V110%, cardiac irradiation dose and dose of affected side lung irradiation in observation group were (11.26±2.59)%, (3.15±0.84)%, (3.72±1.16) Gy and (7.51±2.06) Gy, which were lower than control group. The difference was significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of acute skin reaction, late skin reaction, bone marrow suppression, radiation pneumonia and radiation esophagitis between the two groups (P>0.05). The 5-year disease-free survival rate of the observation group was 98.55%, which was higher than 94.16% of the control group (P<0.05). The 5-year survival rate was 95.65% in the observation group and 94.89% in the control group, with no significant difference (P>0.05). After radiotherapy, the levels of CD+3, CD+4 and CD+4/CD+8 in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, and the level of CD+8 were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion X-ray IMRT after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer can achieve better tumor-free survival, with little impact on immune function. It may be related to the uniform distribution of dose in the target area of the tumor bed and the reduction of radiation dose in the heart and lung of the affected side, which is worthy of clinical application.

Key words:

Breast cancer')">"> Breast cancer, Breast-conserving surgery, X-ray, Electronic line, Intensity-modulated radiotherapy(IMRT), Immune function

中图分类号: 

  • R730.55
[1] 牛 虹, 田同德, 唐静雯, 岳光星, 李华华, 范伊晓, 周浩本.

微小RNA-148a-3p靶向调控MAP3K9表达及对胃癌细胞增殖和凋亡的影响 [J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2019, 24(2): 108-112.

[2] 程春来, 丁 雯, 车 元.

YKL-40调控子宫内膜癌顺铂化疗耐药性的实验研究 [J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2019, 24(2): 113-118.

[3] 杨才弟, 王丽娟, 曾鼎华, 朱剑梅.

miR-122通过靶向RUNX2诱导胶质瘤细胞凋亡的实验研究 [J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2019, 24(2): 124-128.

[4] 何灏澜, 李 倩, 姜 晗, 王 晓, 陆 明.

光辉霉素对胃癌细胞周期、凋亡的影响及可能机制 [J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2019, 24(2): 133-136.

[5] 魏 蕾, 李自雄, 秦叔逵, 刘秀峰.

吉西他滨单药或联合白蛋白结合型紫杉醇治疗东亚人群晚期胰腺癌临床疗效的荟萃分析 [J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2019, 24(2): 137-144.

[6] 张 宁, 卢创新, 务 森, 何 苡, 魏 立.

miR-138-5p在非小细胞肺癌中的表达及临床意义 [J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2019, 24(2): 149-152.

[7] 杨晋生, 古选民, 方军超.

胶质瘤MGMT启动子甲基化及其临床意义 [J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2019, 24(2): 153-157.

[8] 刘政操, 陈清清, 袁光达, 朱佳浩, 吴锦昌, 冀胜军. 中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值评估老年食管癌放疗预后的价值[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2019, 24(2): 167-170.
[9] 王 莹, 张同梅, 董宇杰, 李宝兰. 24例胸腺鳞癌的临床分析[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2019, 24(2): 171-174.
[10] 黄博杰, 何信佳, 赵园园.

紫杉醇联合铂类治疗晚期胰腺腺鳞癌1例 [J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2019, 24(2): 188-189.

Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王杰军,李 睿. NCCN成人癌痛临床实践指南解读[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2009, 14(1): 80 .
[2] 崔传亮,迟志宏,袁香庆,斯 璐,盛锡楠,郭 军. 重组人血管内皮抑制素联合化疗一线治疗晚期黑色素瘤的Ⅱ期临床研究[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2009, 14(1): 74 .
[3] 徐卫国1,杨小青2,郝世柱1,宋纪宁1,张鹏东1,胡潺潺1,王文雅1. 大肠癌组织中Neuropilin-1的表达及其与肿瘤血管生成的相关性研究[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2009, 14(1): 29 .
[4] 翟云芝1,陈振东2,秦凤展1. Ezrin和AKT2在大肠癌组织中的表达及其临床意义[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2009, 14(1): 25 .
[5] 施姗姗1,胡长路1,余元勋,李 娟. Bcl-2/IgH和IgH基因重排与非霍奇金淋巴瘤诊断和化疗效果的相关性研究[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2009, 14(1): 55 .
[6] 周莉莉,李志革. 乳腺癌中BRCA-1和IGF-1R的研究进展[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2009, 14(1): 84 .
[7] 曹 锋,王悦华,李 非 . 结直肠癌肝转移射频消融治疗的研究进展[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2009, 14(1): 93 .
[8] 吴 洁,张连生,柴 晔,宋飞雪,吴重阳,曾鹏云,玲 玲,刘 瑛. β微球蛋白抑制非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者树突状细胞成熟和功能的研究[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2009, 14(2): 111 .
[9] 贾正飞1,冯 永1,仲 琴1,夏晓天1. 香菇多糖联合顺铂治疗恶性胸腔积液[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2009, 14(2): 173 .
[10] 邹 岚1,梁后杰1. 结直肠癌EGFR靶向治疗进展[J]. 临床肿瘤学杂志, 2009, 14(2): 178 .