Chinese Clinical Oncology

• 论著 • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Observation of GEMOX regimen combined with endostar as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma

LI Rong, QIN Shukui,LIU Xiufeng,GONG Xinlei,HUA Haiqing,WANG Lin,CHEN Yingxia.
  

  1. Department of Medical Oncology,Cancer Center of PLA, 81 Hospital of PLA, Nanjing 210002, China
  • Received:2013-12-19 Revised:2014-01-30 Online:2014-05-31 Published:2014-05-31
  • Contact: LIU Xiufeng

Abstract: Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of endostar combined with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin as the firstline treatment for patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma. Methods Forty-eight patients from Jan. 2009 to Aug. 2013 confirmed with pathologic and imaging examination as stage ⅣB primary biliary tract carcinoma were reviewed. Twenty cases received endostar+GEMOX regimen and 28 cases were applied with GEMOX regimen alone. GEMOX regimen was given as follow: gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 iv, d1,d8; oxaliplatin 100mg/m2 iv, d2, 21 days was a cycle. Endostar was given 15mg iv d1-d14, 21 days was a cycle. The efficacy was evaluated strictly after 2 cycles according to RECIST 1.1 criteria, quality of life(QoL)was evaluated accoding to karnofsky scores,safety was evaluated after 1 cycle according to NCI CTC 3.0 version criteria. The time to progress(TTP)and overall survival(OS) were also observed. Results In GEMOX+endostar group, 1 was in CR,3 in PR,12 in SD, and 4 in PD; the response rate(RR)was 20.0%, disease control rate(DCR)was 80.0%; median TTP was 8.6 months and the median OS was 14.0 months; the QoL improved and stable rate was 80.0%. In GEMOX group, 1 was in CR,5 in PR,15 in SD, and 7 in PD; RR was 21.5%, and DCR was 75.0%; the median TTP was 6.0 months and the median OS was 10.0 months; the QoL improved and stable rate was 71.4%. There was statistical difference in TTP and OS between the two groups(P<0.05). The most common toxicity in the two groups were myelosuppression, other main toxicities included nause/vommiting, liver dysfaction, peripheral nearitis, skin allergy reaction and etc, mainly in grade 1-2, and there were no sugnificant differences between the two groups(P>0.05). In GEMOX+endostar group, only 2 case of non-specific T wave changed. One case was of auricular flutter, and 1 case with mild hypertension. Conclusion GEMOX+endostar as the first-line treatment for advanced BTCs has good efficacy, may improve or stabilize the patients QoL and prolong survival, and the toxicities are well-tolerated, which worth clinical use and further observation.

No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!